一份 tomcat vs resin 的测试报告。。。
发表于:2007-07-01来源:作者:点击数:
标签:
----- Original Message ----- From: Griggs, James griggsj .net genshopper.com To: tomcat -dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 3:37 PM Subject: Tomcat vs. Resin I ran an informal test for 9 hours last night on a Win98 PC c
----- Original Message -----
From: Griggs, James <griggsj
.netgenshopper.com>
To: <
tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 3:37 PM
Subject: Tomcat vs. Resin
> I ran an informal test for 9 hours last night on a Win98 PC comparing the
> latest tomcat(apache.org) code and the latest resin
> (caucho.com) both using Suns JDK 1.2. I used 2 instances of socrates to
> simulate 100 users requesting a hello.jsp file at random intervals.
> Tomcat and Resin were running at the same time on different ports.
>
> Result: Tomcat: Resin:
> Total Requests Handled 26094 6546375
> Total Requests Dropped 4691 0
> Requests per Second .1 195
> Average Latency 98.17 .15
>
> I@#m assuming the dramatic difference in requests handled is due to a 60
> second timeout on dropped requests.
>
> I@#m wondering if anyone can explain the dramatic difference in the
results?
> Am I doing something wrong here to cripple Tomcat? (... and since I know
> the question will be asked: I have no affiliation with Caucho ;o)
>
> Jim Griggs
> jim@netgenShopper.com
>
原文转自:http://www.ltesting.net