软件测试工具Winrunner描述性编程

软件测试工具Winrunner描述性编程

刚刚用了QTP的描述性编程，忽然想起用WinRunner也用一下描述性编程。做了感觉还不错，呵呵。。。。

        以下是本人用WINDOW XP自带的一个计算器做的一个小例子：

        #################################################################################
        #
        #  Descrīption-------------Use Descrīption Programing to Test the CALC in Window XP  by WinRunner
        #
        #  Tester------------------Lantian Wei
        #
        #  Modify Time-----------2007-7-24
        #
        #################################################################################

clearcase/" target="_blank" >cccccc cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 width="80%" align=center bgColor=#ffffff border=1 heihgt="">

invoke_application("calc.exe","","c:\\windows\\system32\\",SW_SHOW);         static myarr[]={{1,"+",2,3},{1,"-",2,-1},{1,"*",2,2},{1,"/",2,0.5}};         win_activate("{class: window,label: Calculator}");         set_window("{class: window,label: Calculator}",5);         for(i=0;i<4;i++)         { for(j=0;j<3;j++)              button_press("{class: push_button,label:"&myarr[i,j]&"}");           button_press("{class: push_button,MSW_class: Button,label:=}");           edit_get_text ("{class: edit}", result);         if(index(myarr[i,j],".")==0)         {            if(result==myarr[i,j]&". ")              tl_step("CheckAnswer",0,"The calculatation is right:"&myarr[i,j-3]&" "&myarr[i,j-2]&" "&myarr[i,j-1]&" = "result);            else              tl_step("CheckAnswer",1,"The calculatation is wrong:"&myarr[i,j-3]&" "&myarr[i,j-2]&" "&myarr[i,j-1]&" != "result);           wait(1);           }         else         {           if(result==myarr[i,j]&" ")             tl_step("CheckAnswer",0,"The calculatation is right:"&myarr[i,j-3]&" "&myarr[i,j-2]&" "&myarr[i,j-1]&" = "result);           else            tl_step("CheckAnswer",1,"The calculatation is wrong:"&myarr[i,j-3]&" "&myarr[i,j-2]&" "&myarr[i,j-1]&" != "result);           wait(1);           }         }         win_close("{class: window,label: Calculator}");

   

        以上是本人用描述性编程写的脚本，至此现丑了。如有不足之处还请大家指正！在此先表示感谢！

        通过这个例子的练习，我发现它确实有好多优点，比如你从此不用在关心那烦人的对象库了，而一个测试脚本里基本上在对象库中出现的问题最多了。然而它还是有缺点的，比如对于无法识别的对象，它就无能为力了，而对于那些OBJECT对象，它的支持也不好。所以如果WR对应用程序识别的满好的话，不如用描述性编程试试。

原文转自：http://www.ltesting.net