• 软件测试技术
  • 软件测试博客
  • 软件测试视频
  • 开源软件测试技术
  • 软件测试论坛
  • 软件测试沙龙
  • 软件测试资料下载
  • 软件测试杂志
  • 软件测试人才招聘
    暂时没有公告

字号: | 推荐给好友 上一篇 | 下一篇

RFC340 - Proposed Telnet Changes

发布: 2007-6-23 14:09 | 作者:   | 来源:   | 查看: 12次 | 进入软件测试论坛讨论

领测软件测试网

   
  Network Working Group Tom O'Sullivan
Request for Comments: 340 Raytheon Company
NIC 9933 Sudbury, Mass.
Categories: Telnet
References: RFC328 15 May 1972

PROPOSED TELNET CHANGES

The proposed change to the TELNET protocol calling for one standard
protocol and dropping the idea of minimum implementation seems
reasonable at this time.

I suggest that both Data Types and Hide Your Input be kept for the
following reasons:

Data Types:

The objection stating that switching out of ASCII results in an
irreversible change and loss of control can be met by requiring other
codes to provide to a return to ASCII. Each other code may have its
own return code, however, it may not always be employed. Other codes
are important for alphanumeric terminals that have special devices
attached. Several potential cases can be cited:

1. Cal comp plotter attached to a teletype has logic permitting a
program to turn the plotter on and off. When operating I believe
it uses an 8 bit code which could conflict with Telnet signals.

2. Numerically controlled machines, either controlled from a user
terminal or code prepared by a HOST computer to be punched on the
paper tape punch at a teletype way require the use of an arbitrary
8 bit code.

3. Experiments controlled from alphanumeric terminal or sensor data
collected through a cal-comp like connection may require the use
of a full 8 bit code.

In these cases a transparent data type with a provision for a return
to ASCII mode seems desirable.

As more and more use of data base systems in the network is
considered, the need for and importance of using access keys,
passwords, etc. grows. The fact that it is difficult to select the
length of input to be hidden is not a persuasive argument. Potential
solutions seem to exist, e.g. the protocol could provide for accepting
length statements from the user program, data base system, operating
system, etc. and in default of this, use a default length representing
the server system expected optimum length.

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFCarchives by BBN Corp. under the ]
[ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]

延伸阅读

文章来源于领测软件测试网 https://www.ltesting.net/


关于领测软件测试网 | 领测软件测试网合作伙伴 | 广告服务 | 投稿指南 | 联系我们 | 网站地图 | 友情链接
版权所有(C) 2003-2010 TestAge(领测软件测试网)|领测国际科技(北京)有限公司|软件测试工程师培训网 All Rights Reserved
北京市海淀区中关村南大街9号北京理工科技大厦1402室 京ICP备10010545号-5
技术支持和业务联系:info@testage.com.cn 电话:010-51297073

软件测试 | 领测国际ISTQBISTQB官网TMMiTMMi认证国际软件测试工程师认证领测软件测试网