RFC702 - September, 1974, survey of New-Protocol Telnet servers

领测软件测试网

　　 
　　Network Working Group D.W. Dodds
RFC# 702 BBN-TENEXA
September 25, 1974

SEPTEMBER, 1974, SURVEY OF NEW-PROTOCOL TELNET SERVERS

LAST MONTH'S SURVEY PRODUCED A GRATIFYING AMOUNT OF FEEDBACK CLARIFYING

THE STATUS OF SEVERAL SITES; HOWEVER THERE HAVE BEEN VERY FEW CHANGES IN
THE STATUS OF HOST SERVERS. THE CHANGES IN THIS MONTH'S LIST, IN
NUMERICAL ORDER (HOST NUMBER THROUGHOUT ARE OCTAL):

UCLA-NMC IS NO LONGER A SERVER;
HOST 205 IS NOW BBN-TENEXD, A NEW SYSTEM (BBNB) IS NOW HOST 61;
RAND-RCC WAS ACCIDENTALLY OMITTED FROM THE PREVIOUS LIST;
SDC-LAB HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY ELIMINATED FROM THE LIST UNTIL IT RETURNS
TO THE NET;
I4-TENEXA (117) IS NOT A SERVER--KI4B-TENEX (217) IS, AND HAS BEEN ADDED
TO THE LIST;
AMES-67 FIXED A BUG, REVEALING TO THE WORLD THE NEW-PROTOCOL SERVER (NO
OPTIONS) THAT WAS THERE ALL ALONG;
ISI-DEVTENEX (226) AND USC-ECL (327) HAVE BEEN ADDED.

WHAT FOLLOWS IS AN UPDATE OF THE SUMMARY AND TABULATION THAT APPEARED
LAST MONTH.* THERE IS STILL A LONG WAY TO GO TO 100% NEW-PROTOCOL
IMPLEMENTATION.

TOTAL SERVER HOSTS 34 100%
NO NEW-PROT SERVER 21 62%
TOTAL NEW-PROT IMPLEM. 13 38%
NEW-PROT ON SOCKET 27,
OLD ON SOCKET 1 (2) 6 18%
NEW-PROT ON 1 AND 27 (3) 6 18%
NEW-PROT ON 1 ONLY 1 3%

NOTES:
* ALL DATA IN THIS REPORT WERE GATHERED VIA A SURVEYING PROGRAM RUN AT
VARIOUS TIMES, PLUS A FEW MANUAL CHECKS TO FILL OUT THE DATA. WHAT
IS REPORTED HERE IS THE WAY THE VARIOUS SERVERS WORK AS SEEN BY THE
NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNET AT BBNA, AS OF 23 SEPT. 1974.
(2) THESE ARE THE SITES WHOSE OPERATION IS 100% CORRECT ACCORDING TO ALL
PROTOCOL AND CONVENTIONS, AS I UNDERSTAND THEM.
(3) WE REALIZE THAT SOME OF THE SERVERS THAT APPEAR HERE AS NEW-PROTOCOL
SERVERS ON SOCKET 1 ARE ACTUALLY SERVERS WHICH ATTEMPT TO
COMMUNICATE WITH BOTH OLD- AND NEW-PROTOCOL USER TELNETS ACCORDING
TO WHAT CONTROL SEQUENCES ARE RECEIVED.

TABULATION OF SERVER STATUS FOR ALL SERVER SITES:

HOST HOST SOCKET SOCKET NEW-PROT, OPTIONS
NO. NAME 1 27 IMPLETMENTED(IF ANY)

101 UCLA-CCN OLD X
201 UCLA-CCBS OLD X
2 SRI-ARC OLD X
102 SRI-AI OLD X
3 UCSB-MOD75 OLD X
4 UTAH-10 OLD X
105 BBN-TENEX OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
205 BBN TENEXD OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
305 BBN-TENEXA OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3
106 MIT-DMS NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
206 MIT-AI OLD X
306 MIT-ML OLD X
7 RAND-RCC OLD X
11 HARV-10 NEW X I1, 3; O3
12 LL-67 OLD X
112 LL-TX-2 OLD X
13 SU-AI NEW* NEW* I1, 3
15 CASE-10 OLD X
16 CMU-10B NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
116 CMU-10A NEW NEW I1, 3; O3
17 I4-TENEX OLD X
217 KI4B-TENEX OLD X
20 AMES-67 NEW NEW NONE
126 USC-ISI OLD X
226 ISI-DEVTENEX OLD X
27 USC-44 OLD X
327 USC-ECL OLD X
32 SDAC-44 OLD X
37 CCA-TENEX OLD X
40 PARC-MAXC OLD NEW I1,3,6; O3
43 UCSD-CC OLD NEW I0(!), 3; O0, 3
53 OFFICE-1 OLD X
54 MIT-MULTICS NEW NEW NONE
61 BBN-TENEXB OLD NEW I1, 3, 6; O3

KEY TO SERVER STATUS TABLE:

X NO SERVER AT THIS SOCKET

I# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED INCOMING TO USER
(SERVER SAYS "WILL #")

O# OPTION # IMPLEMENTED OUTGOING FROM USER
(SERVER SAYS "DO #")
(# IS OPTION NUMBER IN NEW PROTOCOL. ALL OPTIONS
IMPLEMENTED BY ANYONE ARE:
0 TRANSMIT-BINARY
1 ECHO
3 SUPPRESS-GO-AHEAD
6 TIMING-MARK)

NOTE: * THERE APPEARS TO BE A MINOR BUG IN SU-AI'S SERVER: IT SEEMS TO
SEND AN IMPROPER RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR OPTION 0.

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFCarchives by Alex McKenzie with ]
[ support from GTE, formerly BBN Corp. 11/99 ]

文章来源于领测软件测试网 https://www.ltesting.net/