• 软件测试技术
  • 软件测试博客
  • 软件测试视频
  • 开源软件测试技术
  • 软件测试论坛
  • 软件测试沙龙
  • 软件测试资料下载
  • 软件测试杂志
  • 软件测试人才招聘
    暂时没有公告

字号: | 推荐给好友 上一篇 | 下一篇

RFC128 - Bytes

发布: 2007-6-23 14:09 | 作者:   | 来源:   | 查看: 12次 | 进入软件测试论坛讨论

领测软件测试网

   
  Network Working Group J. Postel
Request for Comments: 128 UCLA
Category: C.2, D. Computer Science
NIC #5844 21 April 71
Obsoletes: none
Updates: none

BYTES

It is somewhat unclear what to do with the Byte size parameter now
allowed by the 2nd level protocol. I can conceive of an
implementation in which the 3rd level programs never see this
parameter. Crocker implies in RFC123 that control of this parameter
is given to the 3rd level programs and that both sender and receiver
may specify values of the byte size to the NCP.

There are at least two interpretations if the sender and receiver
specify different byte sizes.

I. The first is that the connection is illegal.

II. The second is that the NCP must parse the data stream on receipt
from the.network and into a buffer according to be byte size of
the sender, and subsequently parse the data stream on transfer
from the buffer to the receiver. In this second case there are
two sub cases.

A. One is to consider bits as the basic unit.

For example, if the sender specified byte size = 5 and the
receiver specified byte size = 3 then

Receiver NCP Sender
-+---+---+---+---+ +--------+ +-----+-----+---
|000|001|010|011| <--- | Buffer | <--- |00000|10100|11
-+---+---+---+---+ +--------+ +-----+-----+---

B. The other is to consider bytes as the significant unit and pad
(on the right or left?) or truncate to make things fit, or
other transformation.

At UCLA-Computer Science we are contemplating allowing sender and
receiver to specify different byte sizes and consider bits as the
basic unit (Case II.A.). This does not rule out our considering the
second subcase (Case II.B.). We may allow 3rd level programs to
specify a library or user supplied routine to perform the

transformation between sender and receiver bytes. Perhaps these
transformation routines would be written in the Data Reconfiguration
Language.

[ This RFCwas put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFCarchives by Duncan de Waal 03/98 ]

延伸阅读

文章来源于领测软件测试网 https://www.ltesting.net/


关于领测软件测试网 | 领测软件测试网合作伙伴 | 广告服务 | 投稿指南 | 联系我们 | 网站地图 | 友情链接
版权所有(C) 2003-2010 TestAge(领测软件测试网)|领测国际科技(北京)有限公司|软件测试工程师培训网 All Rights Reserved
北京市海淀区中关村南大街9号北京理工科技大厦1402室 京ICP备10010545号-5
技术支持和业务联系:info@testage.com.cn 电话:010-51297073

软件测试 | 领测国际ISTQBISTQB官网TMMiTMMi认证国际软件测试工程师认证领测软件测试网