• 软件测试技术
  • 软件测试博客
  • 软件测试视频
  • 开源软件测试技术
  • 软件测试论坛
  • 软件测试沙龙
  • 软件测试资料下载
  • 软件测试杂志
  • 软件测试人才招聘
    暂时没有公告

字号: | 推荐给好友 上一篇 | 下一篇

RFC2537 - RSA/MD5 KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name System (DNS)

发布: 2007-6-23 14:09 | 作者:   | 来源:   | 查看: 13次 | 进入软件测试论坛讨论

领测软件测试网

   
  Request for Comments: 2537 IBM
Category: Standards Track March 1999

RSA/MD5 KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name System (DNS)

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the

Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

A standard method for storing RSA keys and and RSA/MD5 based
signatures in the Domain Name System is described which utilizes DNS
KEY and SIG resource records.

Table of Contents

Abstract...................................................1
1. Introduction............................................1
2. RSA Public KEY Resource Records.........................2
3. RSA/MD5 SIG Resource Records............................2
4. Performance Considerations..............................3
5. Security Considerations.................................4
References.................................................4
Author's Address...........................................5
Full Copyright Statement...................................6

1. Introduction

The Domain Name System (DNS) is the global hierarchical replicated
distributed database system for Internet addressing, mail proxy, and
other information. The DNS has been extended to include digital
signatures and cryptographic keys as described in [RFC2535]. Thus
the DNS can now be secured and used for secure key distribution.

This document describes how to store RSA keys and and RSA/MD5 based
signatures in the DNS. Familiarity with the RSA algorithm is assumed
[Schneier]. Implementation of the RSA algorithm in DNS is
recommended.

The key words "MUST", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED", and "MAY"
in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119.

2. RSA Public KEY Resource Records

RSA public keys are stored in the DNS as KEY RRs using algorithm
number 1 [RFC2535]. The structure of the algorithm specific portion
of the RDATA part of such RRs is as shown below.

Field Size
----- ----
exponent length 1 or 3 octets (see text)
exponent as specified by length field
modulus remaining space

For interoperability, the exponent and modulus are each currently
limited to 4096 bits in length. The public key exponent is a
variable length unsigned integer. Its length in octets is
represented as one octet if it is in the range of 1 to 255 and by a
zero octet followed by a two octet unsigned length if it is longer
than 255 bytes. The public key modulus field is a multiprecision
unsigned integer. The length of the modulus can be determined from
the RDLENGTH and the preceding RDATA fields including the exponent.
Leading zero octets are prohibited in the exponent and modulus.

3. RSA/MD5 SIG Resource Records

The signature portion of the SIG RR RDATA area, when using the
RSA/MD5 algorithm, is calculated as shown below. The data signed is
determined as specified in [RFC2535]. See [RFC2535] for fields in
the SIG RR RDATA which precede the signature itself.

hash = MD5 ( data )

signature = ( 00 | 01 | FF* | 00 | prefix | hash ) ** e (mod n)

where MD5 is the message digest algorithm documented in [RFC1321],
"|" is concatenation, "e" is the private key exponent of the signer,
and "n" is the modulus of the signer's public key. 01, FF, and 00
are fixed octets of the corresponding hexadecimal value. "prefix" is
the ASN.1 BER MD5 algorithm designator prefix specified in [RFC
2437], that is,

hex 3020300c06082a864886f70d020505000410 [NETSEC].

This prefix is included to make it easier to use RSAREF (or similar
packages such as EuroRef). The FF octet MUST be repeated the maximum
number of times such that the value of the quantity being
exponentiated is the same length in octets as the value of n.

(The above specifications are identical to the corresponding part of
Public Key Cryptographic Standard #1 [RFC2437].)

The size of n, including most and least significant bits (which will
be 1) MUST be not less than 512 bits and not more than 4096 bits. n
and e SHOULD be chosen such that the public exponent is small.

Leading zero bytes are permitted in the RSA/MD5 algorithm signature.

A public exponent of 3 minimizes the effort needed to verify a
signature. Use of 3 as the public exponent is weak for
confidentiality uses since, if the same data can be collected
encrypted under three different keys with an exponent of 3 then,
using the Chinese Remainder Theorem [NETSEC], the original plain text
can be easily recovered. This weakness is not significant for DNS
security because we seek only authentication, not confidentiality.

4. Performance Considerations

General signature generation speeds are roughly the same for RSA and
DSA [RFC2536]. With sufficient pre-computation, signature
generation with DSA is faster than RSA. Key generation is also
faster for DSA. However, signature verification is an order of
magnitude slower with DSA when the RSA public exponent is chosen to
be small as is recommended for KEY RRs used in domain name system
(DNS) data authentication.

Current DNS implementations are optimized for small transfers,
typically less than 512 bytes including overhead. While larger
transfers will perform correctly and work is underway to make larger

transfers more efficient, it is still advisable at this time to make
reasonable efforts to minimize the size of KEY RR sets stored within
the DNS consistent with adequate security. Keep in mind that in a
secure zone, at least one authenticating SIG RR will also be
returned.

5. Security Considerations

Many of the general security consideration in [RFC2535] apply. Keys
retrieved from the DNS should not be trusted unless (1) they have
been securely obtained from a secure resolver or independently
verified by the user and (2) this secure resolver and secure
obtainment or independent verification conform to security policies
acceptable to the user. As with all cryptographic algorithms,
evaluating the necessary strength of the key is essential and
dependent on local policy.

For interoperability, the RSA key size is limited to 4096 bits. For
particularly critical applications, implementors are encouraged to
consider the range of available algorithms and key sizes.

References

[NETSEC] Kaufman, C., Perlman, R. and M. Speciner, "Network
Security: PRIVATE Communications in a PUBLIC World",
Series in Computer Networking and Distributed
Communications, 1995.

[RFC2437] Kaliski, B. and J. Staddon, "PKCS #1: RSA Cryptography
Specifications Version 2.0", RFC2437, October 1998.

[RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Concepts and
Facilities", STD 13, RFC1034, November 1987.

[RFC1035] Mockapetris, P., "Domain Names - Implementation and
Specification", STD 13, RFC1035, November 1987.

[RFC1321] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC1321
April 1992.

[RFC2535] Eastlake, D., "Domain Name System Security Extensions",
RFC2535, March 1999.

[RFC2536] EastLake, D., "DSA KEYs and SIGs in the Domain Name
System (DNS)", RFC2536, March 1999.

[Schneier] Bruce Schneier, "Applied Cryptography Second Edition:
protocols, algorithms, and source code in C", 1996, John
Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0-471-11709-9.

Author's Address

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
IBM
65 Shindegan Hill Road, RR #1
Carmel, NY 10512

Phone: +1-914-276-2668(h)
+1-914-784-7913(w)
Fax: +1-914-784-3833(w)
EMail: dee3@us.ibm.com

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

延伸阅读

文章来源于领测软件测试网 https://www.ltesting.net/


关于领测软件测试网 | 领测软件测试网合作伙伴 | 广告服务 | 投稿指南 | 联系我们 | 网站地图 | 友情链接
版权所有(C) 2003-2010 TestAge(领测软件测试网)|领测国际科技(北京)有限公司|软件测试工程师培训网 All Rights Reserved
北京市海淀区中关村南大街9号北京理工科技大厦1402室 京ICP备10010545号-5
技术支持和业务联系:info@testage.com.cn 电话:010-51297073

软件测试 | 领测国际ISTQBISTQB官网TMMiTMMi认证国际软件测试工程师认证领测软件测试网